Whenever Any Form of Government Becomes Destructive To These Ends,
It Is The Right of the People to Alter Or To Abolish It,
And To Institute New Government

click.jpg

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Nigel Farage With Donald Trump: Barack Obama "Treated Us As If We Were Nothing"

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Brexit Leader Nigel Farage to Open for Donald Trump Tonight in Mississippi

It is a world-wide movement, after all.


LIVESTREAM 

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Humpday Blues

Junior Wells
Hoodoman Blues



What'd I Say



Trouble No More


Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by midnight rider at permanent link# 2 Comments

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Confirmed: Army Training Slide Calling Hillary an Insider Threat Is Real


From PJM:
An Army spokesman has confirmed that a training slide that lists Hillary Clinton as an "insider threat" is real. The slide -- which shows Hillary Clinton pictured along with the Fort Hood and Navy Yard shooters -- became an internet sensation after it was posted on the U.S. Army W.T.F! Moments Facebook page on Sunday. 
Via the Washington Examiner: 
The other photos show retired Gen. David Petraeus, who gave classified information to his biographer and mistress; Nidal Hasan, who carried out the Fort Hood shooting; Edward Snowden, a former NSA contractor who exposed classified information before seeking asylum in Russia; Aaron Alexis, the Navy Yard shooter; and Chelsea Manning, who gave classified information to WikiLeaks. 
Asked for comment, an Army spokesman confirmed that the photo showed a real training slide that was developed 18 months ago and used locally to teach best practices for handling classified information and maintaining operational security. Maj. Thomas Campbell, a U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command spokesman, said the training slide has been removed. 
"As is common with Army training requirements, the local unit was given latitude to develop their own training products to accomplish the overall training objective. This particular presentation had not been reviewed or approved by the unit's leadership, and does not reflect the position of the Army," Campbell said.
GO READ THE WHOLE THING. 
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Black Lives Matter Thugs Pummel Reporter Until They Release He’s Not White: “Stop! He’s Not White! He’s Asian!”


From Politico:
As the confrontation went on, the crowd became more and more violent. What started as shoving and rock throwing escalated into smashing cars and setting businesses aflame. By nightfall, I was crouching behind a Chevy Suburban to avoid bullets. 
Another intern, a white man who had arrived later on to take photos, huddled beside me. After the gunfire ceased, he emerged from behind the car to take more pictures while I stayed behind. 
“Get your white ass out of here!” he soon heard. “You better not let me fucking catch you!” 
After trying unsuccessfully to defuse the situation, my colleague was flying down the street with a group of men chasing him. Wanting to help, but not knowing how, I decided to run after them. In order to run faster, my colleague dropped the two bulky cameras hanging around his neck. 
When I tried to retrieve them, and yelled at him to get out of the area, some in the group of rioters started chasing after me too. As a former back-of-the-pack runner in middle school gym class, I wasn’t surprised when they caught me. 
When they threw me to the ground, I reflexively curled up into a ball. Blows landed on my back, head and torso. “Stop! He’s not white! He’s Asian!” 
I wasn’t sure who said it, or how they knew my race, but within seconds, the punches stopped. Someone grabbed me by the arm and lifted me up. 
As my vision came back into focus, I saw a group of concerned black faces and heard someone repeating, “Don’t fuck with Chinese dudes.” 
My attackers had run off. Those who had intervened escorted me to safety.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 1 Comments

Trump's "Softening" On Immigration


Trump "softened" his position on immigration.

That's the news as told to us by the Washington Post:
Trump's immigration plan: Deport 'bad ones,' treat 'the rest' like Obama does 
Jenna Johnson The Washington Post 
After spending a few days reflecting on his immigration stances and consulting with Hispanic supporters, Donald Trump on Monday detailed how he would deal with the millions of immigrants illegally living in the United States: 
Enforce laws that are already on the books and continue to do what President Obama is doing, although "perhaps with a lot more energy." 
This strategy marks a sudden change for the Republican nominee, who has presented himself as a politically incorrect outsider who is not afraid to take extreme measures to combat illegal immigration, such as deporting 11 million people or constructing a massive wall along the southern border. 
For more than a year, Trump insisted that all illegal immigrants "have got to go" and that he would create a "deportation force" to carry out the task. Trump struck a starkly different tone during an interview with Bill O'Reilly of Fox News that aired on Monday night. 
Trump said he would separate the country's undocumented immigrants into two groups: The "bad ones" who would be kicked out of the country as soon as he takes office and "everybody else" who would go through the same process that the Obama Administration is currently using. 
"The first thing we're going to do if and when I win is we're going to get rid of all of the bad ones," Trump said. 
"We've got gang members, we have killers, we have a lot of bad people that have to get out of this country. We're going to get them out, and the police know who they are. They're known by law enforcement who they are. We don't do anything. They go around killing people and hurting people and they're going to be out of this country so fast your head will spin. We have existing laws that allow you to do that."
Byron York interviewed Trump back in January of 2016. Here's how it went:
QUESTION: I read Art of the Deal. And one of the things you write about is you have to be bold, you have to make a splash, you have to attract attention. You've also talked about compromise. There was a time you said there's nothing wrong with compromise — you just ask for about three times what you want, and then you get what you want. So I look at deporting all illegal immigrants. I look at a temporary ban of Muslims coming to the United States. They get a lot of attention. Are they opening positions in a negotiation? 
TRUMP: I'm not saying there can't be some give and take, but at some point we have to look at these things. You look at the radical Islamic terrorism and you look at what's going on, we have to take a serious look. There's tremendous hatred. You look at illegal immigration and all that's taking place with respect to illegal immigration, whether it's the crime or the economy, I mean, it affects many different elements. It doesn't mean I'm hard and fast 100 percent, but we to get a lot of what I'm asking for, or we're not going to have a country any more. 
QUESTION: So they are opening positions? 
TRUMP: They are very strong positions. It doesn't mean you're not going to negotiate a little bit, but I guess there will always be some negotiation. But they are very strong positions, and I would adhere to those positions very strongly. That doesn't mean that at some point we won't talk a little bit about some negotiation. Who wouldn't do that?
In May, 2016, I wrote the following:

DONALD TRUMP AND THE BIG, THROBBING AMERICAN GOAL

OR,
How You Know Donald Trump's Over-The-Top Promises Are Not Lies, While Those of Other Politicians Are


Adam Carolla remarked the other day that Donald Trump is The Superhero Version Of An American President.

He is what we all imagine a President should be, because he is willing to make the grand gestures, stopping the speeding locomotive of Political Correctness, able to leap the tall buildings of Leftist Architecture - the Government-Media/Academia Complex - in a single bound.

Donald Trump will let nothing stop him. He will say whatever he has to say to win. He will do whatever he has to stop those opposing him in their tracks.

And we like that because we believe in the same things as him. We Are Americans. We want to win. We Are Americans. We believe in Excellence. We Are Americans. We believe We Are Leaders of The Free World.

We do not believe in timidity. We do not believe we should take a back seat on the bus of collectivism. And we don't believe in losing.

We believe in Winning. Donald Trump said, "We'll be winning so much we will get bored with winning" and we laughed and laughed, because
we know that that's just a joke, because winning never gets boring.

You stand against Trump, he makes fun of you. You insult Trump, he insults you. You oppose his policies, he will beat you.

How?

He will begin to beat you with his words. Then he will beat you at the ballot box. And then, he will beat you into the ground with legislation.

Take the Wall, for instance. People laugh when he promises the wall. Many of us who love Trump don't even believe he means it.

"He won't build a wall," we think to ourselves. "And even if he does, he won't be able to make Mexico pay for it."

But still, even as don't necessarily believe him, we stand here waiting, with baited breath. "Maybe, by God, the man means it. Maybe he really will build that fucking wall, and maybe he really will drag Vicente Fox out into the Town Square of the entire world, and make him write a fucking check."

Maybe he will.

But even if he doesn't, even if Trump doesn't even believe his own words when he says he will, WE STILL KNOW DONALD TRUMP ISN'T LYING!

"Wait a minute," you say. "What do you mean he's not lying? If he says something he does not mean to carry through on, that's a lie, right? Why, I dare say, that's the very definition of a lie."

And certainly it is, IF ANY OTHER POLITICIAN SAID STUFF LIKE THIS IT WOULD BE A LIE.

BUT IT IS NOT A LIE WHEN DONALD TRUMP SAYS IT.

And, everyone knows it is not a lie.

Even those of you accusing him of being a liar, even you know it is not a lie.

Want me to prove it to you?

Ok, here:

You know that Donald Trump is negotiating. That is his opening bid. He will build a wall across the entire Southern Border, and he will make Mexico pay for it.

That's his offer. Take it or leave it.

Now, let's say Mexico is so shrunken, so terror-seized by the audacity of that offer, that they simply cave. They send Vicente Fox out from behind the crumbling, bullet-ridden, adobe facade that is the Mexican Government's moral authority, with his little red checkbook, and he scribbles the payment out with his shaking hand.

Let's say that's what happens.

Do you think Trump wouldn't take the deal?

Of course he would.

And that's how you know he's not lying. That's how you know he means what he says.

He is not attempting to fool us into voting for him by saying things he doesn't mean. Everything he says is a statement of fact as to the direction he wants to go.

He wants it. This is his goal.

THIS IS OUR BIG AMERICAN GOAL. IT'S THE BIGGEST GOAL YOU'VE EVER SEEN.

In fact, you could says IT'S A HUGE GOAL.

Other politicians are mired in small goals, incremental goals, cost-of-living increase goals, food stamp goals, borrow-money-from-our-Social-Security-fund goals.

Other politicians are not going in the right direction. They do not want to extend American Power and Influence. Instead, they want to retreat from our own borders, creating a "borderless world." They do not want to increase American Prosperity. They think Americans have too much, that we're too rich,  and spoiled, that we are the undeserving recipients of "obscene profits."

Donal Trump's goals are America's goals: To Win. That's our Direction.That's our Goal. And we will do whatever we have to do to accomplish what we believe in.

Other politicians don't really believe in that, and even if they say they do, they don't really mean it.

Trump means it. We mean it.
---------

NOW, HERE, TODAY, AUGUST 24, 2016, HERE IS MY OPINION ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION:

Donald Trump had better build the wall, and he'd better stop Islamic immigration from countries that are known for Jihad, or he will be just as fucking useless to us as fucking Jeb Bush.

I have never believed in the deportation of 11 million people.

I've always believed in STOPPING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

AND THEN

GRANTING AMNESTY TO THOSE DESERVING OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP.

The truth of the matter is this, Americans elect the Democrats and the Republicans. 

They are our government. They represent the Will of the People.

They imported these illegal aliens in our names.

We can no more shirk repsonsibility for that than the Germans can for Hitler, or the people who live under Islam can for Islam (as they attempt to do when they call their violent religion a "religion of peace" - you see, to them, it might be peaceful, but if they want the right to call their religion "peaceful", then they have to actually do something about it to make it peaceful. And that includes standing up against those who have made it violent.).

It is true, these illegal aliens were not imported legally, but they were imported with the tacit consent of our duly elected government. It is a conspiracy by our government to circumvent the law. 

And, as we elected these scumbags, it is our responsibility to fix what they have done in our name.

Illegal Immigration is a moral blight on our nation - the likes of which we have not seen since slavery. I'm not saying it is the equivalent of slavery. It is not.

However, it is a fact that we have a Serf class in our nation who do not have equal access to the law.

And that is simply not right.

So, the solution is, BUILD THE FUCKING WALL, 

STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, 

AND 

INTEGRATE THOSE WHO HAVE ALREADY BUILT A PRODUCTIVE LIFE HERE.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 6 Comments

TheHill: We Can't afford to give terrorists a one way ticket back to the battlefield


TheHill: We Can't afford to give terrorists a one way ticket back to the battlefield

Excerpt:
“Outrageous” hardly describes the non-logic of this policy. What Commander-in-Chief lets the enemy return to the fight in the middle of a war?

Nearly 700 inmates have been released from Gitmo, and more than 200 have returned to the fight or are suspected of doing so, according to the Director of National Intelligence. And that’s just who we know about.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Muzzies mess with Texas

Truth Feed News:
The first Islamic Sharia Court in the U.S. just got some very bad news, and Muslims are not happy.
In a close 5-4 vote, the city of Irving ruled to back the Texas state bill banning foreign law from the state. It basically would slam the door in their faces, preventing them from spreading Sharia throughout the country. Now they are accusing the city council of unfairly being targeted.
Won't you feel sorry for these poor Muslims?
By their own website’s admission, if U.S. law conflicts with Sharia law, “we follow Sharia law.” It also openly admitted separate rules for men and women in their proceedings, discriminating and humiliating women which is against the U.S. Constitution. The Islamic Tribunal also openly declared that they hope will “set a precedence that will be emulated and duplicated throughout the country.”
The Dallas Morning News:
“This continues efforts by elected officials who seek to score points with their voting base by demonizing Muslims,” Alia Salem, who directs the North Texas chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, told the City Council before Thursday’s vote. She said it had a choice between “diversity” and “hatred, fear and bigotry.”
Yeah, opposing sharia is now the same as promoting "hatred, fear and bigotry". What's amusing about all this is the website of this sharia court. In their own words:
Stoning adulterers, cutting of the hands, polyandry and the like (all can be traced in the relevant literature and can be explained in their Islamic legal mentality and rational context in fairness and justice), are mainly a part of Islamic Criminal Law. In fact criminal law within Islam only makes up a fraction of the Shari’ah. It is unscholarly and unfair to generalize that type of understanding, that is Criminal Law, to compromise the whole of Islamic law if we stick to speaking in technical terms.
Don't you understand you stupid infidels!? Beheadings, stonings, chopping of limbs, multiple wives, sex slavery -- that's just a small, super tiny, minuscule part of sharia. There's a lot more to sharia than just that, you racist bigots!

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
posted by Isaac Schrödinger at permanent link# 0 Comments

Frenchman (Muslim) Screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ Stabs Brit to Death – Officials Say ‘Motive Not Yet Known’

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

The Nine Lives of Donald Trump


From Victor Davis Hanson:
Seasoned Republican political handlers serially attack Donald Trump and his campaign as amateurish, incompetent, and incoherent. The media somehow outdid their propaganda work for Barack Obama and have signed on as unapologetic auxiliaries to the Hillary Clinton campaign — and openly brag that, in Trump’s case, the duty of a journalist is to be biased. 
We have devolved to the point that a Harvard Law professor teases about unethically releasing his old confidential notes of his lawyer/client relationship with Trump. 
Conservative columnists and analysts are so turned off by Trump that they resort to sophisticated metaphors to express their distaste — like “abortion,” “ape,” “bastard,” “bitch,” “cancer,” “caudillo,” “dog crap,” “filth,” “idiot,” “ignoramus,” and “moron.” Some of them variously talk of putting a bullet through his head given that he resembles, or is worse than, Caesar, Hitler, Mussolini, or Stalin. 
Derangement Syndrome is a more apt clinical diagnosis for the Right’s hatred of Trump than it was for the Left’s loathing of Bush. Had such venom been directed at leftists or minorities, the commentators likely would have lost their venues. 
Trump’s political obituary over the last 14 months has been rewritten about every three weeks. During the primaries, each time he won a state we were told that that victory was his last. Now, in the general-election campaign, his crude ego is supposedly driving the Republican ticket into oblivion. 
The media have discovered that what gets Trump’s goat is not denouncing his coarseness, but lampooning his lack of cash and poor polling: broke and being a loser is supposedly far worse for Trump’s ego than being obnoxious and cruel. So far, he is behind in most of the polls most of the time. 
But not so fast! 
Mysteriously, each time he hits rock bottom, Trump — even before his recent “pivot” — begins a two-week chrysalis cycle of inching back in the polls to within 2 or 3 points of Clinton. Apparently Trump represents something well beyond Trump per se. 
He appears to be a vessel of, rather than a catalyst for, popular furor at “elites” — not so much the rich, but the media/political/academic/celebrity global establishment that derides the ethos of the middle class as backward and regressive, mostly as a means for enjoying their own apartheid status and sense of exalted moral self, without guilt over their generational influence and privilege. 
Given the surprise of Brexit and Trump’s unexpected dominance of the primaries, pollsters seem to fear that his populist support is underreported by 2 or 3 percentage points. Some voters who do not openly profess that they plan to vote for Trump might do just that in the privacy of the polling booth — even as they might later deny that fact to others. 
His latest pivot may be too late, but it certainly hit the right notes by presenting his populist themes — unwise trade deals, defense cuts, inner-city violence, attacks against police, illegal immigration, the war on coal, big-government regulations, and boutique environmentalism — as symptomatic of elite neglect not just of the white working class but of minorities as well, upon whom liberal policy falls most heavily. 
By curbing his personal invective and focusing on Obama’s incompetence and Clinton’s corruption, Trump may succeed in allowing 4 or 5 percent of the missing Republicans and independents to return and vote for him without incurring social disdain. The news cycle favors any outsider — certainly including Trump.

About every three weeks, terrorists butcher innocents in one or another Western country, usually screaming “Allahu Akbar” during their victims’ death throes. These terrorists have often been watched but otherwise left alone by intelligence agencies. Liberal pieties follow, along with warnings to the public about their prejudices, rather than admonitions to radical Islamists to stop their killing. 
The ensuing public backlash does not mesh with the Obama–Clinton narrative that the killings were mere workplace violence, a generic form of “violent extremism,” or had “nothing to do with Islam.” 
Like Jimmy Carter, with his infamous inability to frame the Iranian hostage crisis, so too the latest manifestation of Hillary Clinton is simply unable to identify the origin, nature, and extent of the terrorist threat — much less offer a solution. 
When the president upgrades the ISIS threat from a jayvee classification to something analogous to a fall in the bathroom, the public is not reassured that his former secretary of state understands radical Islamic terrorism. 
In the same vein, with 11 million illegal aliens in the U.S., almost daily we hear a news report of yet another illegal-alien felony, or a new sanctuary city, or an effort by the “undocumented” to get the vote out — none of which enhances open-borders Hillary.

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 1 Comments

Copenhagen, Denmark: Scuzlims March in Support of ISIS

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 4 Comments

Joss Stone
The Answer



Karma



Tell Me "Bout It


Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by midnight rider at permanent link# 1 Comments

Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Sweden: 40 sexual assaults at music festival, all by Muslim migrants


From Jihad Watch:
The music festival “We are Stockholm”, the number of sexual assaults on girls has doubled compared to last year. This was reported by Stockholm police on request of Free Times. 
“And more is yet to come,” said police spokesman Mats Eriksson. 
To date, the police received no less than 40 reports of sexual assaults at the Stockholm Youth Event. “And more is yet to come. 
Last year there were 20 and now there are since this morning already 40,” says press spokesman Mats Eriksson of the Stockholm police. 
According to a report of the police were all sex offenders of foreign origin, particularly men from Afghanistan and Morocco last year. 
Also this year the visitors of the festival were almost exclusively male asylum immigrants and Swedish girls. 
A visitor reported our newspaper that he had almost not a single male Sweden seen at the festival. “I was about an hour there and saw three Swedish guys”. 
The Gothenburg journalist Joakim Lamotte was on Thursday at the festival. On Facebook, he wrote that “large groups of men” in front of the stage surrounded young girls and then groped them…. 
Mats Eriksson reported the majority of victims of assaults are girls 15 to 17. 
“Then still there are some who were older than 18 and some were even younger than 15,” he says….
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 2 Comments

Understand your enemy

Macleans:
A new study based on interviews conducted over social media with foreign fighters in Iraq and Syria raises doubts about the commonly held notion that young men in North America and Europe who are drawn to violent Islamic extremism must be marginalized loners looking for an alternative to their dead-end lives.
The theory is ridiculous but it does allow politicians to blame the West; if only we were compassionate and thoughtful and nice to these fragile flowers, then they wouldn't have cracked and slaughtered innocents.

Notice, how the Religion That Must Not Be Named remains unmentioned. Of course, reality will, sooner or later, hit you like a sledgehammer.
The report repeatedly stresses the finding that, based on what fighters themselves say, they are “pulled” to Iraq and Syria by religious ideas, rather than being “pushed” by the realities of their lives in the West. “None of our sample indicated coming from familial situations of poverty or marginality,” they say. “On the contrary, many indicated they had fairly happy and privileged, or at least comfortable, childhoods. In general, there was almost no discussion of the economic situation of their families.”
Financially poor Muslims don't fly planes into buildings. They don't travel the globe to fight against the infidels. They don't have high-speed internet from which they get their evil education.

Genuinely poor Muslims are too busy not starving to death every day.

It's usually pampered scum like Osama Bin Laden who have too much time and comfort to plan, and then put in motion, their atrocities.

(Originally posted at Isaac Schrödinger.)

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
posted by Isaac Schrödinger at permanent link# 1 Comments

EU President Jean-Claude Juncker: "Borders Are the Worst Invention Ever"

"I'm The King Of The World!"

If you were looking for confirmation that there are people out there, unelected people, who are running things, and who want to set up a "New World Order" free of borders, then you just got it.

From the Daily Mail:
Under-fire EU chief Jean-Claude Juncker risked widening divisions with European leaders today by saying borders were the 'worst invention ever'. 
He called for all borders across Europe to be opened, despite the chaos caused over the last year from the flood in refugees fleeing Syria and the wave of terror attacks hitting various continent's cities. 
The remarkable comments will further undermine Mr Juncker's precarious position as European Commission President. 
He has faced repeated calls to quit after his failure to keep Britain in the EU and the refugee and Greek debt crises. 
Today he accepted the Commission 'deserves criticism' but insisted national government's 'have to share the blame'. 
Speaking at the Alpbach Media Academy this morning, Mr Juncker said: 'Borders are the worst invention ever made by politicians.' 
The contentious remarks from the Brussels chief are the polar opposite of moves by elected leaders of EU member states who have tighten their borders over recent months after more than a million entered the bloc from Syria in less than a year.
Yeah, I remember what the Romanians did to Ceaucescu.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 2 Comments

Huma Abedin left classified documents in the front seat of her car IN INDIA!!!

"I Know There's Something I Forgot to Do, Now, What Is It?"

Emails: Huma Abedin left classified documents in the front seat of her car IN INDIA!!! 

Emails: Huma Abedin Left Clasified Material Unsecured.... planned to burn the material because it was so sensitive 
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 3 Comments

Scuzlim Screaming Allah Akbar Tries To Behead Couple?


From ABC News:
The FBI has launched a federal terrorism investigation into a weekend stabbing in Roanoke, Va., looking at whether the attacker may have been trying to behead his victim in an alleged ISIS-inspired assault, sources tell ABC News. 
ederal authorities have been aware of the alleged attacker, 20-year-old Wasil Farooqui, of the Roanoke area, for some time, sources familiar with the case told ABC News. 
In the past year, he traveled to Turkey and may have tried to sneak into Syria, where ISIS is recruiting and inspiring sympathizers from across the world, sources said. 
Farooqui was arrested Saturday by Roanoke County Police on charges of assault with malicious wounding, and he's being held without bond at the Western Virginia Regional Jail, according to the sources and a jail database. 
During the Saturday stabbing, Farooqui allegedly injured a man and woman at an apartment complex in Roanoke, yelling "Allah Akbar" as he attacked them with a knife, sources told ABC News. 
Authorities believe he may have been trying to behead the male victim, who was likely picked at random, ABC News was told. Farooqui and his two alleged victims were hospitalized after the attack. Their conditions were not clear. 
"The FBI is working with the Police Department following the incident that occurred on Saturday evening," the head of the FBI’s Richmond field office, Special Agent In Charge Adam Lee, said in a statement. 
"While I cannot discuss details of the investigation at this time, I do want to reassure the community that we are working to determine the nature of the incident."
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 2 Comments

Dateline...Roanoke, Virginia: "Allahu Akbar!"

Wasil Farooqui
On August, 22, 2016, Wasil Farooqui, 20, stabbed a man and a woman as they were entering their apartment building. The two victims are seriously wounded.

The crime is now being investigated as an ISIS-inspired attack. Many additional details HERE, including this:


Virginia ISIS attacker Wasil Farooqui attempted to go to Syria, was on law enforcement radar. Yet another #KnownWolf
How many soon-to-be stabbers, beheaders, or bombers are on law enforcement's radar? Too many to keep track of?

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by Always On Watch at permanent link# 0 Comments

Islam, 'Mindslaughter,' and the Catastrophic 'Lewis Doctrine'

How's That Purple Finger Working Out For You?

The text of a speech given by Andrew Bostom to the American Freedom Alliance:

Col. Douglas MacGregor is a respected military strategist who was a heroic tank commander during the 1991 Iraq war.
As the Gen McChrystal scandal broke in 2010, Col MacGregor, who attended West Point with McChrystal, and was angered by the US military’s disastrous Iraq and Afghanistan “nation building” efforts, commented accurately:
The idea that we are going to spend a trillion dollars to reshape the culture of the Islamic world is utter nonsense.
Successful lobbying for that miserably failed utopianism was accomplished by bowdlerizing Islam—indeed mindslaughtering it, a powerful term I will introduce. My discussion will identify the ultimate source of “gravitas” for that bowdlerization process, and key elements of the Islam—not “Islamism,” or “radical Islam”—bowdlerized.

Tuesday August 2nd, (2016) Khizr Khan, who achieved notoriety for his condemnation of Donald Trump at the Democratic National Convention, had thetemerity to tell Anderson Cooper “I do not stand for any Sharia Law because there is no such thing.” Except when he, Khan, notes it does exist, as in his 1983essay published in the Houston Journal of International Law, “JURISTIC CLASSIFICATION OF ISLAMIC LAW”, which used the word “Sharia” 8X, including this usage:
“All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari'ah…”
CNN’s Anderson Cooper did not even challenge Khan’s mendacious, self-contradictory assertion let alone follow-up on Khan’s effusive written praise of two prominent, modern global Sharia promoting ideologues, Said Ramadan, and A.K. Brohi, making plain Khan’s support for so-called “Sharia-based human rights.” The Khan-Cooper exchange illustrates, starkly, the contemporary equivalent of what the great chronicler of Soviet Communist mass murder, Robert Conquest, appositely characterized as MINDSLAUGHTER—a brilliantly evocative term for delusive Western apologetics regarding the ideology of Communism, and the tangible horrors its Communist votaries inflicted. Conquest decried those numerous “Western intellectuals or near intellectuals” of the 1930s through the 1950s whose willful delusions about the Soviet Union, “will be incredible to later students of mental aberration.” He observed,
“One role of the democratic media is, of course, to criticize their own govern­ments, and draw attention to the faults and failings of their own country. But when this results in a transfer of loyalties to a far worse and thoroughly inim­ical culture, or at least to a largely uncritical favoring of such a culture, it becomes a morbid affliction—involving, often enough, the uncritical accep­tance of that culture’s own standards”

His critique of Western media highlights a cultural self-loathing tendency which has persisted and intensified over the intervening decades, and is now manifest in the bowdlerized public discussion of Islam. Tragically, such MINDSLAUGHTERED Islamic discourse extends to an iconic figure in conservative punditry on Islam, while the impact of this doyen’s policymaking advice has been disastrous.
Samuel Huntington acknowledged his indebtedness to Bernard Lewis’s 1990 essay, “The Roots of Muslim Rage,” for Huntington’s book title, “The Clash of Civilizations.” Lewis, as Huntington notes (on p. 213), in 1990, had pronounced,
This is no less than a clash of civilizations—that perhaps irrational, but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judeo-Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide expansion of both.
Oracle-like font of Islamic wisdom to a large swath of conservative policymaking elites, Bernard Lewis added this caveat:

It is crucially important that we on our side should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally irrational reaction against that rival.
Despite his own morally equivocating advice, Lewis himself convinced the Bush 2 administration to pursue what became known, aptly, as “The Lewis Doctrine,” which was not only an irrational, but a catastrophic response to the eminently rational Islamic doctrine of jihad.
Peter Waldman’s methodical, well-sourced Feb 3, 2004 WSJ investigative report (“A Historian’s Take on Islam Steers U.S. in Terrorism Fight  Bernard Lewis’s Blueprint—Sowing Arab Democracy—Is Facing a Test in Iraq”) stands as important confirmation of the overarching ideology which spurred the March, 2003 Iraq invasion. Waldman meticulously documented how Lewis exerted profound influence in shaping the Bush II administration’s “Islamic democracy agenda”—invading Iraq being the sine qua non manifestation of this “Lewis Doctrine.” Lewis, as Waldman notes, began evangelizing his “Doctrine” to the highest level Bush II administration officials just over a week after 9/11, accompanied, significantly, by the late Ahmad Chalabi, a likely “vector” of Iranian influence.
Eight days after the Sept. 11 [2001] attackswith the Pentagon still smoldering, Mr. Lewis addressed the U.S. Defense Policy Board. Mr. Lewis and a friend, Iraqi exile leader Ahmad Chalabi –now [circa 2/2004] a member of the interim Iraqi Governing Council—argued for a military takeover of Iraq to avert still-worse terrorism in the future
Call it the Lewis Doctrine.  ..Mr. Lewis’s diagnosis of the Muslim world’s malaise, and his call for a U.S. military invasion to seed democracy in the Mideast... As mentor and informal adviser to some top U.S. officials, Mr. Lewis has helped coax the White House to shed decades of thinking about Arab regimes and the use of military power. Gone is the notion that U.S. policy in the oil-rich region should promote stability above all, even if it means taking tyrants as friends. Also gone is the corollary notion that fostering democratic values in these lands risks destabilizing them. Instead, the Lewis Doctrine says fostering Mideast democracy is not only wise but imperative.
Waldman also demonstrated how Lewis successfully indoctrinated the ultimate Bush II administration leadership to pursue his utopian design: President George W. Bush, Vice-President Dick Cheney, and most likely, National Security adviser (and later Secretary of State), Condoleeza Rice, as well.

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

The Daily ObamaNation

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Obama Didn’t Enforce His ‘Red Line’ And Bomb Assad Because Iranians Threatened To End Nuke Talks

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 1 Comments

German School Girls Given Temporary “No!” Tattoos to Protect Them from Rapie Refugees


From The Express:
Veronika Wascher-Goggerle, the Women's and Family representative of the district, is behind the launch and said the press-on tattoos would also help raise awareness over the growing issue of sex attacks in swimming pools. 
The Bodenseekreis is famous for its bathing and boasts numerous indoor and outdoor swimming pools. 
Alleged sex attacks by migrants have caused heated debate in the area over the last few months and some pools are hiring extra security - or even banning asylum seekers altogether. 
However, Wascher-Goggerle does not want to associate her campaign with any problems with migrants, stating that there have always been sexual abuse problems at swimming pools, even before the start of the refugee crisis. 
She said: "I think many girls are insecure. What is normal in daily interactions and what should not be allowed and needs to be reported? 
“Illustrations have been made available at swimming pools and should make this clear. 
"The temporary tattoos are an incentive for young swimmers to think about the issue."
To THINK about the issue. But obviously, not to think TOO CLEARLY about the issue.

And certainly not to DO anything about the issue.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 0 Comments

Beth Hart and Joe Bonamassa
I Love You More Than You'll Ever Know



I'll Take Care Of You


Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
posted by midnight rider at permanent link# 0 Comments

Monday, August 22, 2016

Newly Released Clinton Emails Show Huma Abedin Forcing Bahraini Prince To Go Through Clinton Foundation To Arrange a Meeting, Or There Would Be No Meeting


This is a smoking gun. Hillary was using the Clinton Foundation as a Pay-to-Play money-laundering scheme.

From Judicial Watch:
In more than a dozen email exchanges, Abedin provided expedited, direct access to Clinton for donors who had contributed from $25,000 to $10 million to the Clinton Foundation. 
In many instances, Clinton Foundation top executive Doug Band, who worked with the Foundation throughout Hillary Clinton’s tenure at State, coordinated closely with Abedin. 
In Abedin’s June deposition to Judicial Watch, she conceded that part of her job at the State Department was taking care of “Clinton family matters.” 
Included among the Abedin-Band emails is an exchange revealing that when Crown Prince Salman of Bahrain requested a meeting with Secretary of State Clinton, he was forced to go through the Clinton Foundation for an appointment. 
Abedin advised Band that when she went through “normal channels” at State, Clinton declined to meet. 
After Band intervened, however, the meeting was set up within forty-eight hours. 
According to the Clinton Foundation website, in 2005, Salman committed to establishing the Crown Prince’s International Scholarship Program (CPISP) for the Clinton Global Initiative. 
And by 2010, it had contributed $32 million to CGI. The Kingdom of Bahrain reportedly gave between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. And Bahrain Petroleum also gave an additional $25,000 to $50,000.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 2 Comments

The Maleficence of Masoom

Sumaia "Not so innocent" Masoom wrote an article titled On Pakistan, Homophobia & Violence Against the Trans Community.
In Pakistan, there are an estimated 50,000 trans men and women in the KP province, and at least half a million nationwide. Roughly 45 trans men and women have been killed in the province in the past year alone, says activist Farzana Jan. This number is, of course, only inclusive of the killings that have been publicly reported.
Masoom accurately describes the reality in Pakistan. She also understands that this particular ugliness is not limited to that country.
Just last week, model Gigi Gorgeous was detained and prevented from entering Dubai for being transgender.
Of course, staying within that context would require one to ask uncomfortable questions about the huge common factor between Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates: Islam.

As we've learned, Islam can't be blamed.
Most importantly, violence against trans men and women is not just a non-Western problem. In the United States, 14 trans men and women have been killed in just the past six months alone [...]
Masoom is attempting to convince us that both Islamic and Western societies are violent against transgender people. Here's her big "American" example of violence:
On top of all of this, we also cannot forget about the recent tragedy in Orlando, Fla., when 29 year-old Omar Mateen walked into the Pulse Nightclub and opened fire on the crowd of LGBTQ+ patrons.
That's right. She started her article with the horrific assaults in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and then deviously switched to the carnage in the US caused by an "American" who just, by pure undiluted coincidence, happened to be a Muslim.
Transphobia and homophobia are not problems restricted to any one corner of the world, but are widespread issues in every society that must be rooted out and countered with radical love.
Here's my radical option: honesty regarding the evil of Islam.

(Originally posted at Isaac Schrödinger.)

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
posted by Isaac Schrödinger at permanent link# 0 Comments

BREAKING: FBI Finds 15,000 Undisclosed Emails On Hillary Clinton’s Private Email Server

Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 1 Comments

Official At Italy’s Islamic University Calls For “New Final Solution” For Jews


From the Times of Israel:
A senior official at the Islamic University in Lecce, Italy has reportedly called for a “new final solution” to the Zionists. 
In an August 4 Facebook post, Raphael Villani wrote that “there needs to be a final solution for Zionists,” and that “the real Jews are the victims of Zionism,” according to a report published Sunday by the Ynet news site. 
The offending posts were discovered by the Israeli Embassy in Italy, and have since been removed. Villani, who works in the university’s public relations department, also used the platform to criticize Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. 
According to the report, Israeli officials forwarded Villani’s comments to the chairperson of an Israel-Italy inter-parliamentary group, who filed a formal inquiry with the Italian education and interior ministries.
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 1 Comments

UPDATED (This Poll is probably bogus) Trump Leads Clinton by 5+ Points in the Key Battleground State of Pennsylvania


From CBS News.

Oh, how funny. CBS took the story down before I even had time to post it.

No truth will penetrate the barrier erected by the Government-Media/Academia Complex.

Here's Gateway Pundit's post on the story:
REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE DONALD TRUMP HAS SURGED TO A 5-POINT LEAD OVER DEMOCRATIC RIVAL HILLARY CLINTON IN THE KEY BATTLEGROUND STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA AS PER A LATEST POLL. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, August 20, 2016 
(Newswire.com) – Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has surged to a 5-point lead over democratic rival Hillary Clinton in the key battleground state of Pennsylvania as per the poll conducted by CEPEX Center for Excellence in Project Execution, on Friday (19th Aug 2016). 
Trump leads Clinton 41.9 percent to 36.5 percent, with 21.5 percent voters undecided. Trump’s lead is just inside the margin of error and marks the first time that the Republican candidate is catching up in the traditional stronghold state of the democratic party. 
“With the undecided voters holding the key which way the state eventually goes in November, both the campaign teams will be tweaking their ground games to win over this key demographic” – Parth Mukherjee, Expert Principal, CEPEX Center for Excellence in Project Execution. “One of the reasons of Trump’s surge is attributable to increasing support from the women” – added Mukherjee.
UPDATE -



The poll was conducted by a Canadian consulting firm called CEPEX which works in the oil and gas industry and has no background whatsoever in polling. This is their first.

The guys who run it have no credentials in media work. And a 7%+ margin of error makes it all but useless. Take this with a few truckloads of salt.
The poll was conducted by a Canadian consulting firm called CEPEX which works in the oil & gas industry and has no background whatsoever in polling. This is their first.The guys who run it have no credentials in media work. And a 7%+ margin of error makes it all but useless. Take this with a few truckloads of salt. 

This story appeared on the website of a CBS affiliate in San Diego with disclaimers stating it was unverified. (Then they took it down, apparently).

The press release is from an outfit called Newswire. They're a pay-for-play place which charges for publication. You give them your press release and pay the fee and they'll put it out there for public consumption with no review or verification. The poll is from CEPEX, a consulting company which has zero background in polling or surveys. 
Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 5 Comments

Huma Abedin Worked at a Radical Muslim Journal For A Dozen Years

Women For Female Genital Mutilation

From the New York Post:
Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide, and the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11. 
One of Clinton’s biggest accomplishments listed on her campaign Web site is her support for the UN women’s conference in Bejing in 1995, when she famously declared, “Women’s rights are human rights.” 
Her speech has emerged as a focal point of her campaign, featured prominently in last month’s Morgan Freeman-narrated convention video introducing her as the Democratic nominee. 
However, soon after that “historic and transformational” 1995 event, as Clinton recently described it, her top aide Huma Abedin published articles in a Saudi journal taking Clinton’s feminist platform apart, piece by piece. 
At the time, Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-First Lady Clinton. 
Headlined “Women’s Rights are Islamic Rights,” a 1996 article argues that single moms, working moms and gay couples with children should not be recognized as families. It also states that more revealing dress ushered in by women’s liberation “directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.” 
In other words, sexually liberated women are just asking to be raped. 
“A conjugal family established through a marriage contract between a man and a woman, and extended through procreation is the only definition of family a Muslim can accept,” the author, a Saudi official with the Muslim World League, asserted, while warning of “the dangers of alternative lifestyles.” (Abedin’s journal was founded and funded by the former head of the Muslim World League.) 
“Pushing [mothers] out into the open labor market is a clear demonstration of a lack of respect of womanhood and motherhood,” it added. In a separate January 1996 article, Abedin’s mother — who was the Muslim World League’s delegate to the UN conference — wrote that Clinton and other speakers were advancing a “very aggressive and radically feminist” agenda that was un-Islamic and wrong because it focused on empowering women. 
“‘Empowerment’ of women does more harm than benefit the cause of women or their relations with men,” Saleha Mahmood Abedin maintained, while forcefully arguing in favor of Islamic laws that have been roundly criticized for oppressing women. 
“By placing women in the ‘care and protection’ of men and by making women responsible for those under her charge,” she argued, “Islamic values generate a sense of compassion in human and family relations.” 
“Among all systems of belief, Islam goes the farthest in restoring equality across gender,” she claimed. “Acknowledging the very central role women play in procreation, child-raising and homemaking, Islam places the economic responsibility of supporting the family primarily on the male members.” 
She seemed to rationalize domestic abuse as a result of “the stress and frustrations that men encounter in their daily lives.” While denouncing such violence, she didn’t think it did much good to punish men for it. 
She added in her 31-page treatise: “More men are victims of domestic violence than women . . . If we see the world through ‘men’s eyes’ we will find them suffering from many hardships and injustices.” 
She opposed the UN conference widening the scope of the definition of the family to include “gay and lesbian ‘families.’ ” 
Huma Abedin does not apologize for her mother’s views. “My mother was traveling around the world to these international women’s conferences talking about women’s empowerment, and it was normal,” she said in a recent profile in Vogue. 
Huma continued to work for her mother’s journal through 2008. She is listed as “assistant editor” on the masthead of the 2002 issue in which her mother suggested the US was doomed to be attacked on 9/11 because of “sanctions” it leveled against Iraq and other “injustices” allegedly heaped on the Muslim world. 
Here is an excerpt: “The spiral of violence having continued unabated worldwide, and widely seen to be allowed to continue, was building up intense anger and hostility within the pressure cooker that was kept on a vigorous flame while the lid was weighted down with various kinds of injustices and sanctions . . . It was a time bomb that had to explode and explode it did on September 11, changing in its wake the life and times of the very community and the people it aimed to serve.” 
Huma Abedin is Clinton’s longest-serving and, by all accounts, most loyal aide. The devout, Saudi-raised Muslim started working for her in the White House, then followed her to the Senate and later the State Department. She’s now helping run Clinton’s presidential campaign as vice chair and may end up back in the White House. 
The contradictions are hard to reconcile. The campaign is not talking, despite repeated requests for interviews. Until now, these articles which Abedin helped edit and publish have remained under wraps. 
Perhaps Clinton was unaware she and her mother took such opposing views. But that’s hard to believe. Her closest adviser served as an editor for that same Saudi propaganda organ for a dozen years. The same one that in 1999 published a book, edited by her mother, that justifies the barbaric practice of female genital mutilation under Islamic law, while claiming “man-made laws have in fact enslaved women.” 
And in 2010, Huma Abedin arranged for then-Secretary of State Clinton to speak alongside Abedin’s hijab-wearing mother at an all-girls college in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. 
According to a transcript of the speech, Clinton said Americans have to do a better job of getting past “the stereotypes and the mischaracterizations” of the oppressed Saudi woman. She also assured the audience of burqa-clad girls that not all American girls go “around in a bikini bathing suit.” 
At no point in her long visit there, which included a question-and-answer session, did this so-called champion of women’s rights protest the human-rights violations Saudi women suffer under the Shariah laws that Abedin’s mother actively promotes. Nothing about the laws barring women from driving or traveling anywhere without male “guardians.” 
If fighting for women’s rights is one of Clinton’s greatest achievements, why has she retained as her closest adviser a woman who gave voice to harsh Islamist critiques of her Beijing platform?






Top Hillary Clinton confidante Huma Abedin played no formal role in a radical Muslim journal — even though she was listed as an editor on the hate-filled periodical’s masthead for a dozen years, a campaign rep claimed Sunday. 
“My understanding is that her name was simply listed on the masthead in that period,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said hours after The Post broke the bombshell story. “She did not play a role in editing at the publication.” 
Merrill said Abedin was just a figurehead and not actually on staff at the Saudi-based and -funded Journal of Minority Muslim Affairs, which featured radically anti-feminist views and backed strict Islamic laws roundly criticized for oppressing women. 
...Her brother, who was an associate editor, and a sister, also employed as an assistant editor, are listed as staff members.
Yes, that's right. Her name was on the masthead. Here it is:


Imagine someone put your name on the masthead as being responsible for the publication of articles calling for women to have their clits hacked off.

Imagine that.

Would you fucking allow that? 
-------
For your amusement...check out the interactive visual map at Discover the Networks: Huma Abedin.

-------

ProjectVeritas video clip exposes Huma, Clinton and Syrian migrant-refugee support/shenanigans
-------




Huma Abedin was working as ASSISTANT EDITOR at her mother's radical Muslim journal when it blamed America for 9/11

-------


Bookmark and Share
posted by Pastorius at permanent link# 8 Comments


Older Posts